This is a great post by Guy Kawasaki about why he decided to create a FB Fan page for his new book launch, rather than a separate custom website. I think “speed of implementation” is a great motivation for going this route. However, I might argue his point that a website would cost significantly more than a custom souped-up Fanpage.

I have been aware of the “opt-in” content reveal possibilities for FB pages, and only my lack of time to mess around with FBML coding has prevented me from further experiments with it (that and the rumor that FBML is going out and everything will be implemented as iFrames soon… [sorry for the geeky aside…]).

Anyway, it’s very difficult to do real SALES on an FB page, so you will need something online that can handle sales and link to it from any FB pages you create. (For example, Guy includes links to Amazon, BN.com, Borders, and Indie Bound bookstores.) If what you are promoting is not being sold by a third-party, you’re still going to need a “sales page” outside the realm of Facebook. In those cases, I say – Do both.

Read it all: Ask the Wise Guy: Facebook Fan Page or Website? : The World :: American Express OPEN Forum

Comments (1) -

Joshua Steck

I think the old paradigm is still a good one: A Facebook page makes your brand friendly, a website makes you money.  

I do agree with Guy on two points--

It is a gain-more-followers kind of game as companies, brands, and individuals are continually motivated to see ROI in terms of quantity over quality.

Second, setting up shop exclusively on Facebook is a risky, albeit silly proposition.  The big players e.g., Facebook and Twitter are ultimately seeking monetization (it seems) so I wonder what type of decisions will be made to reach those goals and how it will change people's use of those sites.    

And, I agree with you--doing both and having sites linked and working together is like the magic middle, right?

You mention "opt-in" and FBML coding on FB-- totally new to my ears!  
  

Comments are closed